We don't "implement software." You get an IT solution that builds, once and for all, a system that runs like clockwork.
Projects from $10,000
clients in the system we run today
tasks migrated from the old CRM with zero losses
weeks to a version people actually use
upfront payment for work that didn't work
Six phrases you hear every day. Alone, each one is a ten-minute nuisance. Together, they add up to the number you'll calculate on the next screen.
None of these phrases looks like a $200,000-a-year problem. That's exactly why nobody counts them.
This isn't a sales pitch. It's arithmetic nobody usually does. Move the sliders to match your team.
Time spent searching, forwarding, clarifying, and re-entering the same thing.
At a project cost of $45,000. After that, it's pure savings every month.
And that's only the lost hours. Missed deadlines, lost leads, and knowledge that left with people aren't included.
Not "work stages," but things you can take with you, even if we stop working together.
A diagram of how work really flows, with the breaking points marked and a number showing what each break costs you per month.
The part that removes your most expensive pain, already in use by your team. Plus short training and access set up on your email accounts.
How many people log in daily and how many operations went through the system. The same report decides the money question.
Prices included. So you can see the scale of projects we take on right away, without guessing whether you fit.
Work lived in spreadsheets, chats, and people's heads: only the person doing a task knew who was doing what. We built one loop: inquiry → client file → tasks by stage → deadlines and owners → money. For the first time, the owner sees which step every case is on and where it got stuck.
Pipelines built around real stages, not someone else's template. Tasks with reminders, roles and permissions, payment history for every client. We moved everything accumulated over the years, with correspondence and dates, so no deal lost its history. The manager stopped building reports by hand: the month's numbers are visible any day, not a week after it ends.
Seven USCIS forms used to be filled out by hand, several hours each, and a single mistake could mean a rejection. Now an employee types "fill out I-140 for the client" in the chat, and the system pulls up the file, asks for anything missing in plain language, and hands back a finished PDF. Every field goes through five independent checks, down to verifying what's actually drawn in the file, not just what's stored in it.
We start with the process map: by day three you see a diagram of your own work and a number showing what its breaks cost. Then you decide: work with us, do it yourself, or not do it at all.
Map my processHonest about all of them, including when you don't need us.
| Off-the-shelf CRM | In-house developer | Novo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to results | 1–2 weeks to set up, then six months of "tweaking" | 2–4 months while they learn your process | 3 weeks to a version people actually use |
| First-year cost | $3,000 — $12,000 in subscriptions plus setup, and again every year | from $60,000 in salary and taxes, and again every year | $15,000 — $80,000, one time |
| Fits your process | You bend your process to the software | Yes, if the developer is strong | Software is built around your process |
| When you pay | Subscription upfront, then every month | Salary from month one, before any results | $0 until launch. Half when the team is working in the system |
| If it doesn't work | The subscription is already paid | The salary is already paid | You don't pay |
| When it's the honest choice | Your process is standard, like everyone else's | You need a long-term staff member | Your process is unique and already costing you money |
The exact figure comes after the process map. You see the range now so you don't waste time if it's not your budget. We don't take projects under $15,000: that money can't buy something you'd later stand behind with your own.
We put our money behind the result, so we only take processes where there's already something to lose. Below is an honest filter by scale, so nobody wastes time.
Not "if you don't like it." The criterion is measurable and checked against a report you can see: how many people log in daily and how many operations went through the system.
Half when the system is live and your team is working in it. The other half after 30 days, if the report shows it's being used. Before launch, you pay nothing.
Because we don't take projects we're not sure about. Saying no on the first call is cheaper than spending six months convincing a team to use something they don't need.
No middlemen: you talk directly with the people who design and build your system.
Each project gets exactly the people your task needs:
Common story: it was set up around the software, not around your process. We start from the other end: first a map of how work actually flows at your company, and only then the tool. You don't have to throw the old system away, either. Often it's enough to pull the data out of it.
It's real, because in 3 weeks we don't build "the whole system." We build one area that removes your most expensive pain. The rest gets added later, as needed. If the process turns out to be more complex than it looked on the map, we'll tell you before work starts, not at the end.
We stop. You pay only for what's already live and in use, and the process map and code stay with you. No termination penalties.
We will, if you're happy with us. Or any developer: the code is standard, access is yours from day one, and there's no lock-in to our platform. That's a matter of principle: we should stay because working with us pays off, not because you have nowhere else to go.
No. We work with the US, Europe, and Ukraine, in Russian, Ukrainian, and English. The only difference is time zones: we find a call window that works for each team.
Leave your contact. We'll ask a few questions and, on the very first call, show you exactly where time gets lost and what it costs per month. No presentations, and no "we'll think it over and send a proposal."